Home Long & Short

An Investment Cycle needs three things. India now has all three.

Avatar photo

Dinesh Chinnasamy

September 4, 2026
📧

An Investment Cycle needs three things. India now has all three.

Investment cycles do not begin because sentiment improves. They begin when three separate conditions arrive at the same time: companies willing to spend, balance sheets strong enough to carry the spending, and a financial system able to fund it. Any two of the three produces a false start. India has spent most of the past fifteen years with, at best, two. That changed this year.

Itus Three Conditions 1

Willingness: companies are already spending

Capital expenditure among listed Indian companies has reached approximately ₹12.6 trillion — more than double the previous cycle peak of around ₹6 trillion. The composition matters as much as the headline figure. The bulk of this sits in property, plant and equipment. That is real capacity being built: factories, plants, physical assets. It is not acquisitions, and it is not financial engineering dressed up as investment. This distinction is worth pausing on, because it separates a genuine investment cycle from a balance-sheet reshuffle. When capex flows into acquisitions, ownership changes hands but productive capacity does not increase. When it flows into PPE, something new gets built.

Corporate India is not talking about investing. It is doing it.

Capacity: balance sheets have never been lighter

Debt-to-equity across listed non-financial corporates has fallen to roughly 0.42 — the lowest reading in a series stretching back to 1997. CMIE’s longer dataset reaches the same conclusion from a different direction, placing listed non-finance leverage at a record low in records going back to FY91. Three decades of data, and the balance sheet has never carried less debt. Interest cover tells the complementary half of the story. It currently sits near 6.7 times — effectively where it stood at the 2007 peak, but supported by roughly 40% less debt underneath it. Two extremes at once namely near-peak debt-servicing ability alongside record-low leverage have not occurred together at any prior point in this series. 2007 had the coverage without the discipline. Most of the 2010s had neither. The past four years delivered falling leverage but middling coverage. Only now do both align.

Availability: the funding is there, and it is reaching borrowers

Banking system liquidity surplus stood at ₹9.71 lakh crore on 2 September 2026. But the more revealing number is the weighted average call rate, which has fallen 44 basis points below the repo rate to 4.81%. That tells you the RBI’s 125 basis points of cuts are actually reaching borrowers rather than being absorbed into bank margins. Transmission is working. Bank credit to industry grew 20% in July. The money is available, it is cheap, and it is being deployed.

One caveat worth stating plainly

The liquidity surge is not entirely organic. Banks raised a record $127 billion through dedicated foreign-currency inflow programmes, and that — combined with month-end government spending — drove much of the recent move. It is expected to moderate by the third quarter of FY27 as seasonal factors drain funds from the system. So the thesis should not rest on the headline liquidity figure. It should rest on the call rate sitting below the repo rate, and on credit to industry growing at 20%. Those describe a functioning transmission mechanism, and they survive after one-off inflows wash through. India’s last great capex cycle in 2007 had willingness and it had availability. Credit was abundant, sentiment was euphoric, and companies spent freely.

What it lacked was capacity.

Debt-to-equity sat at 0.71 even at the height of the boom. The strong interest cover of that period was a function of peak earnings rather than a light balance sheet — and when earnings turned, the leverage was still sitting there. Coverage more than halved within two years. The decade that followed was spent repairing damage rather than building anything. The cycle did not fail because companies stopped wanting to invest. It failed because they could no longer afford to. That is precisely the condition which is strongest today.

What this does not guarantee

Preconditions are not outcomes. Capacity to invest is not the same as sustained willingness. Demand still has to justify the capacity being built — capex that meets weak end-demand destroys returns rather than creating them. Global conditions can turn. The liquidity will moderate. Any of these three legs can weaken. The honest position is that the conditions are in place, not that the outcome is assured. But the specific constraint that ended the last cycle is not binding this time. That is a meaningful difference, and it is not one that shows up in headline index valuations.

Where this leaves investors

The implication is less about timing the cycle than about deciding where to stand within it. Capital goods, industrials, power, infrastructure, materials and engineering all sit directly in the path of this spending. So do the lenders financing it — although competition for that lending will likely compress margins over time, which is a separate consideration and not automatically a positive one.

This makes a solid case for the return of actively managed investments that can manage and navigate the dispersions.

Sources

Subscription Details

Itus Capital’s fund follows a staggered subscription model, with subscription windows opening on a fortnightly basis.

You may visit the link below to read our previous contents and keep following us for more like these.

As always, we keep re-emphasising our SIP mode of investment. You can connect with your relationship manager to know more about our SIP Program.

 

← Previous

Stat 2.8 – Monthly Data Dive of 10 essential charts shaping the markets

Related Blogs

Container

The box that changed the world

Before the 1950s, moving goods across the world was painfully inefficient. Ships arrived at port stacked with thousands…

August 2026